Homosexual Adoption essays

Homosexual Adoption essays There has been a dramatic increase in the number of homosexual couples looking to adopt children recently. Even though there is this increase, there have been many obstacles for them to adopt. Such obstacles are biased adoption agencies and certain laws restricting them from adopting; for example only some states allow homosexuals to adopt. As a result of these barriers, they have been looking for other ways to have children. From domestic adoption agencies to independent adoptions to international adoptions to just public adoptions, homosexuals have a variety of ways of adopting, but they are treated very differently from heterosexuals. Even though they are all humans and see and breathe the same way, homosexuals are badly treated just because they chose to live a different life style. Why can ¡t homosexuals have the ease in adopting just like heterosexuals do? Gay couples must prove they have adequate finances, good health, emotional stability, proper motivation and parenting skills. These are excellent qualifications that should be checked when a couple wants to adopt. The problem is, many couples are getting away with not meeting all of these qualifications because they are heterosexual (Galluccio, 54) The American Civil Liberties Union estimated that one hundred thousand out of the five hundred thousand children in foster care are awaiting adoption. There were qualified adoptive parents for only twenty percent of these children in 1997. In 1996, only one out of every five available children was adopted. If states such as Mississippi, Utah, Florida, and New Hampshire did not ban homosexuals from adopting, many of the children stuck in foster care would have parents and homes. Many lesbians and gay couples used to hide their sexual preferences because of the homophobia in the child-welfare system. Now many same-sex couples seeking to become foster or adoptive parents do not want to pretend they are merely roo...

Is Self

Is Self Introduction Selfs of long-term effects of abortion include miscarriages, stillbirths, low birth-weight babies, and infertility (McDonagh 57). On the other hand, procedures carried out during abortion expose mothers to several health complications that risk their lives and well-being. These include tearing of the cervix, fever and peritonitis, uterus perforation, thrombosis, and risk of infection during blood transfusion (McDonagh 59). Other risks include increased possibility of tubal pregnancy and death from hemorrhage. These complications have been reported in cases where unqualified individuals conducted abortion. Abortions that are conducted by certified and experienced practitioners are safe and few cases of complications have been reported. Opponent’s arguments are not strong enough to explain why a mother should be exposed to harm by failing to conduct an abortion. Conclusion Abortion is a contemporary moral issue that is unacceptable in many societies. Self-defense ab ortion takes place in cases where birth of a child puts the life of the mother at risk of either physical or non-physical danger. In addition, it is acceptable in some societies on basis that a woman has a right to chose what is best for her. The utilitarianism doctrine holds that individuals should perform acts whose consequences result in beneficial outcomes.Advertising Looking for research paper on social sciences? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More From that definition, self-defense abortion is allowed if it results in gratifying outcomes that avoid painful consequences. It is permissible and ethical to save a mother from physical harm such as death, and non-physical harm such as mental, emotional, or psychological disturbances. Self-defense abortion saves many women from physical, emotional, and psychological suffering. Opponents argue that abortion is unacceptable and immoral. They argue that self-defense abortion is murder and a fetus has a right to life. In addition, they argue that it exposes women to health complications such as sterility and miscarriages in future pregnancies. However, they ignore the fact that consequences of allowing birth of an unwanted baby are more severe than aborting it. Therefore, self-defense abortion is acceptable and permissible. Boonin, David. A defense of Abortion. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003. Print. Davis, Nancy. Abortion and Self-defense. Philosophy and Public Affairs 13.3 (2002): 175-207. Print. Huffman, Tom. Abortion, Moral Responsibility, and Self-Defense. Public Affairs Quarterly 7.4 (2003): 287-302. Print. McDonagh, Eileen. Breaking the Abortion Deadlock: From Choice to Consent. London: Oxford University press, 2004. Print. Shaw, William. Contemporary Ethics: Taking Account of Utilitarianism. New York: John Wiley Sons, 2004. Print.

Organizational Analysis paper Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Organizational Analysis paper - Assignment Example The board of directors was however behind the scenes and the principal was the leader. The principal spent most of her time communicating with the parents, students and teachers about issues to do with the vision of the school as well as the policies. She was in charge of calling for faculty meetings in case of any miscommunication, indiscipline cases or other matters concerning the teachers that needed to be passed to the students. Her effective communication skills with the stakeholders of the school led to an increase in funding and donations to the school as a way to appreciate her work. Everything was not always smooth despite the effectiveness of the communication. This was evident in a few cases where there was failure in communication due to various barriers. The most common of these barriers were brought about by channels used to pass the information to the students and teacher as well as other staff in the school which at times proved to be problematic. Most of the time the communication to students was carried through the school’s public addresses system that was connected from the principal’s office to the hallways, classrooms, recreational schools and even the cafeteria. There are times the system failed and especially when there was power blackout as it was not connected to the backup generator. The leadership of the institution was very coordinated based on the fact that the information and decisions came from the board of directors to the principal who carried out the disbursements role very well that the board did not have to worry about finding another channel to pass the news. In fact the effectiveness of the leadership was obvious from the fact that not many people knew about the existence of the board or who were the board members as everyone dealt with the principal. The principal and the deputy principal who were the leaders were not managers but rather servants as well as